Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Final Polish Proposition 30 OP-ED



Proposition Education
Ethan Ahlstrom
10/16/2012
English 2

             
              It is well known that this nation is facing a financial crisis, leading to cuts in valuable programs that not only help our nation progress, but bring more money back into our economy. California is a shining example of how improper usage of funds and mismanagement of essential programs has lead to devastating cuts. Everyday schools seem to lose more than they give. With class sizes shrinking, course offerings disappearing and tuition exploding the education system is enduring a problem that has never been seen before. In Community Colleges alone we have seen $809 million in budget cuts in the last 3 years, and 485,000 student enrollment decreases with a 24% reduction in course sections over the past 4 years. Governor Jerry Brown has taken the role of foreman for the California redemption job site by advocating Proposition 30 hopefully bringing billions of dollars back to our schools. With voting day within sight, it is important for residents of this great state to see our issues and realize what will happen to our schools should Prop 30 not pass. Education needs to be our priority, it is the key to a future of plenty for Californians and everyone needs to do their part to save our most important commodity, an educated populace.
               What we as a state face on November 6th is a chance to save our schools from a near $6 billion cut affecting K-12, Community Colleges, CSU and UC school systems. This gives us a chance to save thousands of jobs for instructors and administrators, save courses, resources and enrollment cuts. Prop 30 avoids a $250 million cut to CSU and UC each and stops an additional $150 tuition increase for CSU this coming spring. CSU tuition has increased 300% in the past decade and at Cabrillo College we have seen over 400 classes dropped, roughly 95 staff jobs lost and a tuition hike from $26/unit to $46/unit. These classes are too expensive as it is and we can expect more loans for students and an increased drop-out rate due simply to a lack of means as opposed to a lack of motivation or need.
                In recent years we have seen numerous measures to raise taxes fail under California voters. This is due to the lack of concise assurances that these tax raises will go to what is needed, not for the state government, high/low income families, cancer research, state parks, but for the entire population and future of the state. These are all factors in a healthy economy and thriving community but in order for a population to willingly vote to pay more, they must be convinced that there is no alternative to enhancing their lives and the lives of their children. Proposition 30 is what the state has been waiting for, we have the need, the representation and the means. These means include an increase on sales tax for .25% for 4 years and an income tax increase of 1%-3% for high income earners of over $250,000 annually for 7 years. These earners make up 3% of the population and yet would generate 90% of the Proposition’s revenue, should it pass.
               Now, in the past Californians have not been keen on the idea of taxing those who have earned there money. Are they simply putting their hard earned dollars to programs that are destined to fail? To politicians and administrators who are not doing their jobs? Perhaps in the past, but now in 2012 as we see the rich get richer and poor, poorer, with unemployment rising, college degrees decreasing and schools losing money we can see the need for change. It is evident that this tax increase is not only necessary it is ethically correct. It is in the best interests of those who can afford it to give to those in need for the success of our state community. As Governor Jerry Brown stated, “If people say no, we don’t want to tax the most rewarded and blessed among us, we want to close schools, ok. I’ll manage the best we can”. Taxing the rich has become California’s fail-safe. The state is on the shoulders of these high income earners and it is time for them to make the difference. Voters need to understand that without this tax increase our schools will continue to take cuts, lose jobs and paint a grim picture for the future and generations to come.
          As a Community College student and future CSU student, I find myself jumping from one cut to the next. College has changed in the way that not only do you need more units and a broader spectrum of subjects in order to get a degree, you have to wrestle to get into these classes  as well as paying a minimum of $70 per textbook on top of the  near doubled tuition since 2009. It seems an uphill battle has turned into a rock climb with no equipment, and the only way to continue is take loans from one source or another, making every student stop and wonder “Is this worth my time?” I've gone through semesters where I haven’t gotten over 9 units simply because I was sitting on the floor with 10 other hopefuls. This does not make for a good learning atmosphere. There is plenty of competition after college, seeing this much now in the beginning stages of my adult life and the reality of the importance of succeeding and the consequences of not, when there is only so much in your power is simply depressing.
       On top of the seemingly unacceptable cuts our schools are taking currently, we can expect much worse should this Prop not pass. California is preparing for either outcome from the measure and the motions that have been set are disturbing for any involved in the schooling system. H.D. Palmer, spokesman for the state department of finance explains that if the measure doesn't pass “we still have an obligation to maintain spending closely to the revenues we take in, so the legislature pre-approved a package of so-called trigger cuts, reductions in state spending, that will automatically take effect on Jan 1 of next year”. Together, K-12 and College school systems make up over half of the California state budget meaning these “trigger cuts” will result in $5.4 billion being cut from K-12 schools and Community Colleges. Alternatively, Proposition 30 states that temporary tax revenues from the measure will be applied specifically to K-12 at 89% and Community Colleges at 11%. Meaning, the failing of Proposition 30 will result in no new funding for the schools as well as a massive cut to an already dwindling system.
               The future of California is at stake. We need to show support for students, teachers and administrators so they can make our education system as meaningful and effective as it used to be. In K-12 we are seeing the lowest SAT scores in history, grades are down, teachers are losing jobs and resources and we are facing a 3 week cut in K-12 schools, while the rest of the world seems to be excelling. I went to boarding school in Great Britain for 8th grade. I was 13 years old, went to school at 7 am, took twelve classes per day and finished class around 5 pm. This was normal to most students, most of them got off class and immediately started working on course work. They were introduced to critical thinking and argumentation long before I arrived and I found myself overwhelmed and under-prepared. We simply cannot afford to be making cuts to our schools that are teaching our children how to live and grow and succeed in the real world. There is no question why we are outsourcing jobs and degrading our own achievements when we are facing a world that is steaming ahead.
I see Proposition 30 as the beginning of the new education system in California, we have a chance to shape the future of this state. We need to set an example and prove to ourselves and this nation that education is the key to our success, not only in our personal lives, but on a global scale. If we want to be considered a world leader, if we want to be proud of where we’re from and how our labor shapes our society then we need to invest in education. Stopping catastrophic cuts, funding our schools and changing our perspectives for the greater good is how we create a foundation for future generations for years to come. Where children go to school with books and motivated teachers, where college students find their goals are not being prohibited by obstacles they cannot defeat and where we create a more unified state with the sole purpose of improving our future.
Works Cited
"California Proposition 30, Sales and Income Tax Increase (2012)." - Ballotpedia. N.p., 23 Sept. 2012. Web. 23 Sept. 2012. <http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/California_Proposition_30,_Sales_and_Income_Tax_Increase_(2012)>.

Kelly, Erika. "Prop. 30: Taxes for Schools and Public Safety: The California Report." The California Report. KQED Public Radio, 3 Oct. 2012. Web. 14 Oct. 2012. <http://www.californiareport.org/archive/R201210030850/a>.

Mapp, Lauren J. "The Mesa Press." : Looming Budget Cuts May Depend on Prop 30. N.p., 11 Oct. 2012. Web. 14 Oct. 2012. <http://www.mesapress.com/news/2012/10/11/looming-budget-cuts-may-depend-on-prop-30/>.

Schiff, Lisa. "BeyondChron: San Francisco's Alternative Online Daily News » School Beat: CaliforniaÂ’s     Competing Tax Measures." BeyondChron: San Francisco's Alternative Online Daily News » School Beat: CaliforniaÂ’s Competing Tax Measures. Beyond Chron, 6 Sept. 2012. Web. 23 Sept. 2012. <http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=10463>.

No comments:

Post a Comment