Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Paper #2 Final Polish


December 10, 2012

Dear Rupert Murdoch

It is in human nature to want a governing force with the interests of all citizens in mind to create a more utopian society, and this notion of catering to a specific demographic is outdated and oppressive. There have been numerous circumstances throughout history of tyrants and greedy men in power who have blatantly used their influence to benefit their personal gains with no regard to the well-being of the people they claim rule over. This rule, in the modern era is not exclusively the President, the Military, the House or the Senate. No, the power is in the control of the constituencies of these Governmental processes, the owners of the fortune 500’s and those who feel it is their right as the wealthy, to get what they want. Inequality is a common enemy to all the human race and anything that can be done to combat it should be considered admirable. Discouraging education, healthcare, women’s rights and the staples of life to women and minorities is in itself the war every human is fighting. This is a balancing act between allowing those who deserve opportunities a chance to make a difference while maintaining a beneficial ruling class with those in power acting responsibly. Masculinity in society is a powerful tool used by those in control to retain the status quo of the culture and reap the benefits that come with oppressing the less fortunate.

The working class has been dominated by men until recent history, and while this is considered a social norm we can never see true equality at home. The culture of the world is changing with new jobs in new fields being created every year. We have a need for a diverse work force with a variety of different skills that do not necessarily cater towards men and their masculinity. Rather than having the men be the main bread earners there should be an equal balance between the sexes as to what their individual responsibilities truly are. Already, we are seeing women snatching a vast number of jobs as they become available because they are qualified and have the need to make a name for themselves. According to the Educational Attainment in the United States:2010, 36 percent of women ages 25 to 30 hold bachelor’s degrees or higher, while men hold only 28 percent. This alone proves that women are preparing for a work force shift that men are not ready for. They are getting their education, motivation and equipment needed to not only enter the workforce, but take control of it. The notion of a stay at home mom is disappearing while in many fields women are holding more jobs than men. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, women now hold 51.4 percent of managerial and professional jobs—up from 26.1 percent in 1980. The man with the weight of the world on his shoulders is simply disappearing. It is interesting, seeing these changes come about, in the short 22 years I’ve been around I have seen more and more families since 1990 who either have both parents working or the mom working while the dad takes care of the children. That man whose sole responsibility is earning is an outcast, he stands alone in a world where joint responsibility is quickly becoming a social norm.  So, with women getting more prepared to work and taking more available jobs we see how it is imperative for men to stop fighting this clearly evident movement of women in the workforce and learn to relinquish their testosterone based power struggle when it is in the best interests of an entire nation.

Greed and power seem to coincide in every culture and those that suffer for it are the lower and middle class when their needs are not being met by a masculine driven ruling class. Rather than having one demographic making decisions for an entire populace it should be more equally dispersed to reduce the overwhelming odds for or against a bias cause. The recent depression was caused by greedy men spending frivolously with no consequences which resulted in the majority of the working class paying for it. Having more women and minorities in power would reduce this unchecked greed and provide more equality for a vast demographic. We have seen instances of women in power throughout Europe and Asia and the apparent good they have done for their countries. Iceland is called the most feminine place in the world and after the bank crash in 2008 they had to go into crisis mode. After firing a number of male administrators and replacing them with women, along with not bailing out 3 of their biggest banks, Iceland fared much better than other European nations. According to the Inter-Parliamentary Union, as of 2012 Rwanda, Andorra and Cuba all have a majority of women that are occupying lower house seats and there are many others that are approaching very quickly. With the world moving towards a fresh look at women in power we see results and attitudes shifting towards the better for equality and general well-being. Now, not all men seem so gung-ho to refute this feminist movement and reduce the male power monopoly. In fact, since the birth of this country we have seen numerous prominent male figures get involved in the feminist movement for example “men such as Thomas Paine, John Dewey and Ralph Waldo Emerson supported women’s campaigns for property rights, equal access to education and suffrage” (Kimmel and Mosmiller 1992). During a lecture on women’s suffrage Emerson continued his support by saying “[L]et the laws be purged of every barbarous impediment to women” (Emerson 1992: 219).  If the general consensus around masculinity is that educated, successful and influential men are joining this movement for whatever reason be it rational or not, there is merit to it. This merit adds power to the movement allowing the idea of a more diverse ruling class to take form in the minds of all citizens.

Fox News is a shining example of the media portraying a completely dysfunctional modern perspective of women, minorities and masculinity. From The Five to Fox and friends, this news organization reinforces ancient gender roles through every station they put on the air. The men are white, the women are slow but attractive, and in every single piece of what they call journalism they manage to subliminally brainwash their die-hard viewers to believing what they say is truth through rhetoric and playing on previously established social biases. This news organization has lost all credibility and merit through their backwards views and support of backwards people. Recently, the infamous Suzanne Venker was welcomed back to Fox and friends, after her declaration on the fictional “war on men”, to give her views on women’s roles in the home, workplace and to her husband, she argues that “ women “like to gather and nest and take care of people” while men “are hunters: they like to build things and kill things.” As a consequence, she maintains a man’s place is in the office; “his” woman should simply “surrender” to his rule” (Zack Baeuchamp). Perhaps if we lived in caves and relied on roaming herds of buffalo to survive this perception of a woman might have merit. But, by modern standards any free thinking human being completely rejects this notion. Not only are these views a massive generalization of women and men, they are insulting to any woman who perceives herself and is perceived as independent and has a rational understanding of not only relationships but how men truly do operate. Rather than fox attempting to retain the masculine status quo in which it was bred, where women were objects, men were white and people actually watched it’s programing, can’t the conservative agenda be portrayed within the parameters of this culture and this reality? The simple answer is, as long as the needs of the owners are being catered to, the country can burn. A disconnect must be made from the supplier to the news story, news is not a tool to be manipulated into a weapon, it is just a tool every citizen should be able to rely on.  Fox news is dying, and with it so are it’s viewers. According to the Politicususa, CNN and MSNBC saw their ratings increase in 2011, while Fox saw a 3% drop. The average viewer for Fox is 65 and they have the lowest ratings by far for the younger viewer. If this News organization is any indication of the growing support for equality, based on the endorsements Fox has, there is still hope for equality and a less masculine driven media in the future.

How women are perceived is a mixture of a self-perpetuation by individuals who see an easy road to what they want and how that is all tailored to what men want because they hold all the prizes. Masculinity thrives on these pretenses by allowing women to make their own rules as to who is on top through the lens of a male perspective. This comes in varying forms, from wives submitting to their man’s rule to selfish, success-driven single women who use their sexuality to hold some invisible title of dominance. Masculinity views these women as objects to a man’s needs for success in the eyes of other men, a completely natural cycle to show who is dominant. The byproduct of this nature vs. nurture approach is an increase to men’s entitlement to women and power, which seemingly separates all classes and walks of life at a fundamental level. Rather than having women of certain classes and social standings deciding what they want and how to get there for all women, it should be a universal understanding between women about their struggles and what a common goal for all of them could be, in this instance : equality in the home, work force, and in their relationships with men. This movement of women as equal citizens cannot possibly come to fruition if there are those still trying to claw their way up the social ladder or submitting to the objectivism of a poor relationship. Both genders are susceptible to this easy path of playing off the advantages you have as opposed to working hard and showing moral fiber. The ignorance of not seeing the bigger picture by thousands if not millions of women is disintegrating this feminist movement by reinforcing men’s perception of women and women’s own perception of themselves.

Men have the opportunity to change the face of this planet and the future of the entire human race, and all that is required of them is to relinquish power that they have proven incapable of handling on their own. As the geography of the planet changes, the human race must adapt in order to survive. The same can be said for this new generation of workers and a new era of equality. Learning from our mistakes is one of the most valuable tools we have been given and to squander that gift is committing to ideals that will limit us. Masculinity is what we make it to be, our living standards are what we make them to be and if our goal is to make a better society for all humans our definition of masculinity must coincide with that of equality and understanding.

Sincerely,


Ethan Ahlstrom

Paper # 2 annotated bibliography


Annotated Bibliography
Ashe, Fidelma. The New Politics of Masculinity: Men, Power and Resistance. London: Routledge, 2007. Print.
Fidelma Ashe is a current instructor of at the University of Ulster where she teachers Political Ideologies, Political Theory and Political Identities, and American Politics. She has written a number of published works on politics and gender roles and got her BSSc at Belfast University followed by her PHD. In this book she outlines the issues surrounding men and masculinity with respect to the political effects of feminism in the new world. This work is meant to explain how the new politics of masculinity is rooted in the claim that the social, political and economic conditions of capitalist societies have " exerted pressure on men's traditional roles and identities, producing a generation of men less secure than their fathers were about their place and function in society"(1). Meant for people seeking an explanation to how and why this apparent decline in men's confidence in society is being manifested. This is relevant to my topic because it outlines the limitations created for the opposite sex, by the opposite sex. It illuminates a question where the answer is in the question itself.

Beauchamp, Zack. "Fox News Op-Ed Says Women’s Nature Is To Be Dominated By Men."ThinkProgress RSS. N.p., 7 Dec. 2012. Web. 10 Dec. 2012.
Zack Baeuchamp is a reporter for thinkprogress.org. He has contributed to Andrew Sullivan’s The Dish, Foreign Policy and Tablet magazines. He has 2 B.A’s in Political Science and Philosophy from Brown university and an M.Sc in International Relations from the London School of Economics. His audience in this piece about women’s anti-feminism is for both men and women who clearly don’t agree with the notion and find it typical of Fox News. This is different from my piece from Jason Easley because it illuminates the intricacies of Fox New’s fallacy. It shows why Fox news is losing credibility and why they are going down every year. For my thesis, it amplifies the idea that Fox is run by a masculine driven agenda that simply uses a tool like Fox News to spit it’s conservative garbage.


Easley, Jason. "Viewers Continue To Flee Fox News as Ratings Drop for a Second Straight Year." PoliticusUSA. N.p., 19 Mar. 2012. Web. 10 Dec. 2012.
Jason Easley is a regular contributor the Politicususa website. He has written numerous articles on Fox news, conservatism and general bologna we have been getting from the far right. Easley writing this article on Fox news to his fellow Fox haters as one more thing to be disgusted by Fox with. This work helps me centralize my topic around my intended audience: Rupert Murdoch. It is gives my paper credibility in stating facts about Fox and it’s demographic decline and how that can be related to it’s bias, amateur journalism that is clearly lying to it’s viewers and how that is a byproduct of the sexist ownership and obvious subordination to it’s agenda.

"Women in Parliaments: World Classification." Women in Parliaments: World Classification. N.p., 31 Oct. 2012. Web. 10 Dec. 2012.
Women in national parliaments is a trusted statistic website that gives information on various governmental functions worldwide. It shows how there is still a large gap between equality in Government but there are places in the world that are beginning to turn more feminist and have benefitted for it. This website helps back up the idea that the world is run by men and they have not done enough to solve problems. The audience for this site is most likely curious folks like myself who like information on the global state of the world’s governments.

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Paper #2 Final Draft


December 2, 2012
Dear Rupert Murdoch
It is in human nature to want a governing force with the interests of all citizens in mind to create a more utopian society, and this notion of catering to specific demographic is outdated and oppressive. There have been numerous circumstances throughout history of tyrants and greedy men in power who have blatantly used their influence to benefit their personal gains with no regard to the well-being of the people they claim rule over.  Inequality is a common enemy to all the human race and anything that can be done to combat it should be considered admirable. Discouraging education, healthcare, women’s rights and the staples of life to women and minorities is in itself the war every human is fighting. This is a balancing act between allowing those who deserve opportunities a chance to make a difference while maintaining a centralized government with those in power acting responsibly. Masculinity in society is a powerful tool used by those in control to retain the status quo of the culture and reap the benefits that come with oppressing the less fortunate.
The working class has been dominated by men until recent history, and while this is considered a social norm we can never see true equality at home. The culture of the world is changing with new jobs in new fields being created every year we have a need for a diverse work force with a variety of different skills that do not necessarily cater towards men and their masculinity. Rather than having the men be the main bread earners there should be an equal balance between the sexes as to what their individual responsibilities truly are. Already we are seeing women snatching a vast number of jobs as they become available because they are qualified and have the need to make a name for themselves on their own. According to the “Educational Attainment in the United States:2010” 36 percent of women ages 25 to 30 hold bachelor’s degrees or higher while men hold only 28 percent, this alone proves that women are preparing for a work force shift that men are not ready for. They are getting educated, motivated and properly equipped to not only enter the workforce, but take control of it. The notion of a stay at home mom is disappearing as well with numbers of employed women holding more jobs in the United States than men. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, women now hold 51.4 percent of managerial and professional jobs—up from 26.1 percent in 1980. So, with women getting more prepared to work and taking more available jobs we see how it is imperative for men to stop fighting this clearly evident movement of women in the workforce and learn to relinquish power when it is in the best interests of those capable and prove to get results.
Greed and power seem to coincide in every culture and those that suffer for it are the lower and middle class when their needs are not being met by a masculine driven ruling class. Rather than having one demographic making decisions for an entire populace it should be more equally dispersed to reduce the overwhelming odds for or against a bias cause. The recent depression was caused by greedy men spending frivolously with no consequences which resulted in the majority of the working class paying for it. Having more women and minorities in power would reduce this unchecked greed and provide more equality for a vast demographic. We have seen instances of women in power throughout Europe and Asia and the apparent good they have done for their countries. Iceland is called the most feminine place in the world and after the bank crash in 2008 they had to go into crisis mode. After firing a number of male administrators and replacing them with women along with not bailing out 3 of their biggest banks, Iceland fared much better than other European nations. According to the Inter-Parliamentary Union, as of 2012 Rwanda, Andorra and Cuba all have a majority of women that are occupying lower house seats and many others that are approaching very quickly. With the world moving towards a fresh look at women in power we see results and attitudes shifting towards the better for equality and general well-being. Now not all men seem so gung-ho to refute this feminist movement and reduce the male overall power monopoly. In fact since the birth of this country we have seen numerous male figures get involved in the feminist movement for example “men such as Thomas Paine, John Dewey and Ralph Waldo Emerson supported women’s campaigns for property rights, equal access to education and suffrage” (Kimmel and Mosmiller 1992). During a lecture on women’s suffrage Emerson continued his support by saying “[L]et the laws be purged of every barbarous impediment to women” (Emerson 1992: 219).  If the general consensus around masculinity is that educated, successful and influential men are joining this movement for whatever reason be it rational or not, there is merit to it. This merit adds power to the movement allowing the idea of a more diverse ruling class to take form in the minds of all citizens.
How women are perceived is a mixture of a self-perpetuation by individuals who see an easy road to what they want and how that is all tailored to what men want because they hold all the prizes. Masculinity thrives on these pretenses by allowing women to make their own rules as to who is on top through the lens of a male perspective. Ultimately it is causing self-inflicted wounds to women as a whole thus holding back entire nations. Masculinity views these women as objects to a man’s needs for success in the eyes of other men, a completely natural cycle to show who is dominant. The byproduct of this nature vs. nurture approach is an increase to men’s entitlement to women and power which seemingly separates all classes and walks of life at a fundamental level. Rather than having women of certain classes and social standing deciding what they want and how to get there, it should be a universal understanding between women about their struggles and what a common goal for all of them could be, in this instance : equality. This movement of women as equal citizens cannot possibly come to fruition if there are those still trying to claw their way up the social ladder, both genders are susceptible to this easy path of playing off the advantages you have as opposed to working hard and showing moral fiber.
As a competitive race, we have always enjoyed sports and idolizing certain skills and abilities. This in itself doesn’t aid in the separation of equality but does outline masculine traits that help define cultures. In the United States American football is vastly popular and in some cases can be perceived as a religion which results in many families integrating masculine competition into their daily lives. Approaching life from a competitive stand point not only gives people a one sided and ignorant view on how to approach problems but how to approach people, particularly women.
This idea of sports playing a role in masculinity is dwarfed by the obvious employment of video games, movies and music in society. All media seems to revolve around bettering yourself through material goods, drugs, strength, power, money; essentially everything you truly don’t need in life is being advertised at every corner. This constant bombardment of simply wrong undertones has given people of all ages wrong impressions of what they need out of life. Saying men need to be stronger, more independent and have everything under their control and women need to be sexier, younger, able bodied and also more independent shows who is really running this garbage and what their end goal truly is. Everything you see in the advertising world is run by those in power, those who seek to control and influence for their own personal gains which is drastically spreading inequality in solidifying what they believe masculine and feminine means and how they can use that definition to their advantage.
Men have the opportunity to change the face of this planet and the future of the entire human race, and all that is required of them is to relinquish power that they have proven incapable of handling on their own. As the geography of the planet changes, the human race must adapt in order to survive. The same can be said for this new generation of workers and a new era of equality. Learning from our mistakes is one of the most valuable tools we have been given and to squander that gift is committing to ideals that will limit us. Masculinity is what we make it to be, our living standards are what we make them to be and if our goal is to make a better society for all humans our definition of masculinity must coincide with that of equality and understanding.
Sincerely,


Ethan Ahlstrom

Sunday, November 25, 2012

Rough draft #2


November 24, 2012
Dear Rupert Murdoch:
It is in human nature to want a governing force with the interests of all citizens in mind to create a more utopian society, and this notion of catering to specific demographic is outdated and oppressive. There have been numerous circumstances throughout history of tyrants and greedy men in power who have blatantly used their influence to benefit their personal gains with no regard to the well-being of the people they claim rule over.  Inequality is a common enemy to all the human race and anything that can be done to combat it should be considered admirable. Discouraging education, healthcare, women’s rights and the staples of life to women and minorities is in itself the war every human is fighting. This is a balancing act between allowing those who deserve opportunities a chance to make a difference while maintaining a centralized government with those in power acting responsibly. Masculinity in society is a powerful tool used by those in control to retain the status quo of the culture and reap the benefits that come with oppressing the less fortunate.
The working class has been dominated by men until recent history, and while this is considered a social norm we can never see true equality at home. The culture of the world is changing with new jobs in new fields being created every year we have a need for a diverse work force with a variety of different skills that do not necessarily cater towards men and their masculinity. Rather than having the men be the main bread earners there should be an equal balance between the sexes as to what their individual responsibilities truly are. Already we are seeing women snatching a vast number of jobs as they become available because they are qualified and have the need to make a name for themselves on their own. According to the “Educational Attainment in the United States:2010” 36 percent of women ages 25 to 30 hold bachelor’s degrees or higher while men hold only 28 percent, this alone proves that women are preparing for a work force shift that men are not ready for. They are getting educated, motivated and properly equipped to not only enter the workforce, but take control of it. The notion of a stay at home mom is disappearing as well with numbers of employed women holding more jobs in the United States than men. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, women now hold 51.4 percent of managerial and professional jobs—up from 26.1 percent in 1980. So, with women getting more prepared to work and taking more available jobs we see how it is imperative for men to stop fighting this clearly evident movement of women in the workforce and learn to relinquish power when it is in the best interests of those capable and prove to get results.
Greed and power seem to coincide in every culture and those that suffer for it are the lower and middle class when their needs are not being met by a masculine driven ruling class. Rather than having one demographic making decisions for an entire populace it should be more equally dispersed to reduce the overwhelming odds for or against a bias cause. The recent depression was caused by greedy men spending frivolously with no consequences which resulted in the majority of the working class paying for it. Having more women and minorities in power would reduce this unchecked greed and provide more equality for a vast demographic. We have seen instances of women in power throughout Europe and Asia and the apparent good they have done for their countries. Iceland is called the most feminine place in the world and after the bank crash in 2008 they had to go into crisis mode. After firing a number of male administrators and replacing them with women along with not bailing out 3 of their biggest banks, Iceland fared much better than other European nations. According to the Inter-Parliamentary Union, as of 2012 Rwanda, Andorra and Cuba all have a majority of women that are occupying lower house seats and many others that are approaching very quickly. With the world moving towards a fresh look at women in power we see results and attitudes shifting towards the better for equality and general well-being.
How women are perceived is a mixture of a self-perpetuation by individuals who see an easy road to what they want and how that is all tailored to what men want because they hold all the prizes. Masculinity thrives on these pretenses by allowing women to make their own rules as to who is on top through the lens of a male perspective. Ultimately it is causing self-inflicted wounds to women as a whole thus holding back entire nations. Masculinity views these women as objects to a man’s needs for success in the eyes of other men, a completely natural cycle to show who is dominant. The byproduct of this nature vs. nurture approach is an increase to men’s entitlement to women and power which seemingly separates all classes and walks of life at a fundamental level. This movement of women as equal citizens cannot possibly come to fruition if there are those still trying to claw their way up the social ladder, both genders are susceptible to this easy path of playing off the advantages you have as opposed to working hard and showing moral fiber.
As a competitive race, we have always enjoyed sports and idolizing certain skills and abilities. This in itself doesn’t aid in the separation of equality but does outline masculine traits that help define cultures. In the United States American football is vastly popular and in some cases can be perceived as a religion which results in many families integrating masculine competition into their daily lives. Approaching life from a competitive stand point not only gives people a one sided and ignorant view on how to approach problems but how to approach people, particularly women.
This idea of sports playing a role in masculinity is dwarfed by the obvious employment of video games, movies and music in society. All media seems to revolve around bettering yourself through material goods, drugs, strength, power, money; essentially everything you truly don’t need in life is being advertised at every corner. This constant bombardment of simply wrong undertones has given people of all ages wrong impressions of what they need out of life. Saying men need to be stronger, more independent and have everything under their control and women need to be sexier, younger, able bodied and also more independent shows who is really running this garbage and what their end goal truly is. Everything you see in the advertising world is run by those in charge, those who seek to control and influence for their own personal gains which is drastically spreading inequality in solidifying what they believe masculine and feminine means and how they can use that definition to their advantage.
Men have the opportunity to change the face of this planet and the future of the entire human race, and all that is required of them is to relinquish power that they have proven incapable of handling on their own. As the geography of the planet changes, the human race must adapt in order to survive. The same can be said for this new generation of workers and a new era of equality. Learning from our mistakes is one of the most valuable tools we have been given and to squander that gift is committing to ideals that will limit us. Masculinity is what we make it to be, our living standards are what we make them to be and if our goal is to make a better society for all humans our definition of masculinity must coincide with that of equality and understanding.
Sincerely,
Ethan Ahlstrom

Sunday, November 18, 2012

Annotated Bibliography

Ashe, Fidelma. The New Politics of Masculinity: Men, Power and Resistance. London: Routledge, 2007. Print.
Fidelma Ashe is a current instructor of at the University of Ulster where she teachers Polical Ideologies, Political Theory and Political Identities, and American Politics. She has written a number of published works on politics and gender roles and got her BSSc at Belfast University followed by her PHD. In this book she outlines the issues surrounding men and masculinity with respect to the political effects of feminism in the new world. This work is meant to explain how the new politics of masculinity is rooted in the claim that the social, political and economic conditions of capitalist societies have " exerted pressure on men's traditional roles and identities, producing a generation of men less secure than their fathers were about their place and function in society"(1). Meant for people seeking an explanation to how and why this apparent decline in men's confidence in society is being manifested. This is relevant to my topic because it outlines the limitations created for the oppoiste sex, by the opposite sex. It illuminates a question where the answer is in the question itself.

Hanlon, Rachel L. "India's Views on Gender Roles." Asian Culture (2007): n. pag. Web. 18 Nov. 2012. <http://www.helium.com/items/1014741-indias-views-on-gender-roles?page=2>.
Rachel Hanlon is a mother of three, winner of multiple awards in jounralism and an avid reader. She has written multiple articles and provides a healthy perspective from an educated consumer. In this article she explains how India's culture and religion have created a rather oppressive world for women where they have limited resources to education, healthcare and individualism. She writes "Indian women usually suffer from a low social status compared to men and are sometimes treated negatively. But on the other hand women are revered in Hindu practices with many ceremonies dedicated to them, but Indian society and laws still fail to treat women with equal rights as men" (1). This will give an inside look on the effects of masculinity in other cultures. Not only through the obvious inequality that is seeded within the culture but how this inequality effects the society as a whole. This work differs from my other citations because of its specificity to India and women's rights.

Louie, Kam. Theorising Chinese Masculinity: Society and Gender in China. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002. Print.
Professor Kam Louie was Chair Professor of Chinese Studies at Queensland University and has written multiple books on Chinese culture. In this piece she outlines the definitions of masculinity through our the Chinese culture past and present. Her most important note is that about the dichotomy of wen and wu which is the scholar and the martial artist and how their roles of masculinty differ in some aspects but are congruent in other and how this affects the culture as a whole. She notes " Chinese masculinity, it will be shown, can be theorised as comprising both wen and wu so that  cholar is considered to be no less masculine than a soldier" (11). This gives a general understanding of the Chinese culture and the categorization of men in society, ranks held and honor given. Knowing that, this article will allow me to outline how a different culture gives precedence to certain traits and skills and how that affects the women of the culture. This differs from my other articles because it takes a look at masculinity from a completely different lens from that of India and North America which will allow me to elaborate on the differences and similarities between cultures.

Sunday, November 11, 2012

Proposal

Masculinity: Who made that up?
Masculinity and Femininity have always been around. It is written in our genes that there are certain roles that are to be played by each sex. The power given to these two terms is what defines them and what defines the culture in which those definitions take effect. This leads to a mis-communication or overcompensation of the flawed power given to these terms to find there place in an ever changing global society. Faith in these flawed powers leads to inequality and general misunderstanding of the true roles each sex plays which results in a fundamental breakdown in the inevitable progression to an utopian society which all rule driven humans seek. I plan to illuminate these powers and the effects they have in certain societies and how they are constantly combating our want to progress. I will use Kimmel's "Bro's before Ho's" to magnify what he believes these flawed powers are and how he sees their effects being played out in society. The evidences provided will be abstract in the sense that it is not tangible to those who don't look for it or those who choose not to see it, yet it will show exactly how gender roles can and do hurt the human race. The bulk of my argument will be backed up mostly through the use of pathos to convey the realty of these powers and their effects on people on a global scale

Sunday, November 4, 2012

RA 3- Salam

In Reihan Salam's article written in 2009 titled "The Death of Macho", he explains how a male dominated society is beginning to decline and recede to an equal gender society and how the engrained ideal of macho is beginning to diminish. He notes that the recent recession is the consequence of male incompetence in the financial capitalism world and how men can either accept the fact that women will soon be equally responsible for financial security if not the main caretakers. Salam is writing to anyone who cares to listen, generally those who are obsessed with their ideals and refuse to accept the way of the future tend not to listen to radical new theories based on fact or not, so his message will not be heard universally and arguably to those who need to hear it most. Salam wants to see a more successful society and believes that equality is of the utmost importance if this is to be done. Salam states there are now only two choices left to men "adaptation: men embracing women as equal partners and assimilating to the new cultural sensibilities, institutions, and egalitarian arrangements that entails." or " resistance. Men may decide to fight the death of macho, sacrificing their own prospects in an effort to disrupt or delay a powerful historical trend" (633).

Salam uses pathos by making connections of the oppression women face in other countries such as Russia and China and yet are still upholding jobs and taking in money to support their families. There are 10.4 million more women than men in Russia and yet they still make less money and are exposed to sexual exploitation at work and hypocrisy at home while having the highest working age women employment rate than any other country. Salam explains "Puttin has aided and abetted these men, turning their nostalgia for the lost macho of Soviet times into an entire ideology" (634). Which translates into a resistance to this new movement resulting in all around loss of total income and a drop in their economy and country-wide health and satisfaction. This is the result of flawed and outdated ideals that eventually hurt everyone and is translated to his audience as being the tell tale signs of a new world with new ideals.

The author uses logos by describing the problems in the current economy with job losses and general sociological changes that have been products of the recession both here in the US and in Europe. He recites " soon, there will be three female college graduates for every two males in the United States, and a similarly uneven outlook in the rest of the developed world" (630). Salam calls this a "he-cession" which means it is not only a loss of jobs for men, but a loss of this so called "macho" which is results in an increase in the need for females to step up. Men are not suited for the jobs that are becoming available in this new world while women have been preparing and are ready to accept responsibility that men are not. This back up the theory of this new world change where men choose to resist and lose out or adapt and reap the benefits that it entails.

Salam's use of this term "macho" is an important factor in his persuasive writing. It encompasses not only the ideals in the "guy code" but it represents a flawed perspective on the current roles in society in regard to working families and what is the sociological norm. Salam explains "the problem of macho run amok and excessively compensated is now giving way to macho unemployed and undirected- a different but possibly just as destructive phenomenon" (632). The buying in to this idea of macho and social norms is causing self-inflicted wounds on men around the globe and hurting women trying to make a name for themselves as individuals and as an equal gender which is resulting in an overall decline of socials acceptance and household income. Disturbing and real, this irresponsibility of men to accept reality and move on accordingly will hurt the global society and lead the U.S to an even more divided country, adding another reason to manifest hatred and inequality. This is portrayed by Salam in his constant use of "macho" derogatory or not.

This article is effective and interesting and holds a message that would not be wise to disregard. It is obvious that the global economics and sociology is changing, and those that refuse to listen or even hear it will be left in the dust and end up regretting it. The world moves quickly and this is just one example of how those who are too out of touch to understand it and refuse to acknowledge it are the perpetuators of problems that cannot be rectified without support.

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

RA #2- Morgan

 "From Fly-Girls To Bitches and hos" is Joan Morgan's attempt to spread awareness of how rap and hip-hop is affecting the black community and how women are buying into the sham of idolizing these deeply troubled men. Being a woman, black, feminists and a fan of rap music gives Morgan an extremely credible view on the intricacies of the rap community including their cause and affect on the black community. She speaks about responsibility; how and why these rapper's lyrics represent their true feeling and attitudes as well as how women react to fame and fortune, throwing away all sense of pride and compassion. Morgan is speaking to anyone affected or offended by these rappers, to bring to light how complex and underestimated these problems are in all communities. That the shallow insults are simply a cover up for deep, concise issues that has taken hold of the rap community in the form of self perpetuation.

Morgan gives us a small eyewitness to how her views are credible and well researched based on the terminology she uses. We know now that she is from the very community she is talking about and that she has and friends and family involved in the dangerous rap world being used or abused in some way shape or form. She does an excellent job in explaining to the audience how she is hurt by the lack of compassion in her community and how her love doesn't seem to be reciprocated by her "brothers" and "sistas". She explains "[y]eah, sistas are hurt when we hear brothers calling us bitches and hos. But the real crime isn't in the name calling, it's their failure to love us- to be our brothers in the way that we commit ourselves to being their sistas" (604). This magnified views of the lack of chemistry between these men and women is a root problem according to Morgan, it highlights a fact that many people seem to not recognize while listening to their albums, "Any man who doesn't truly love himself is incapable of loving us in the healthy way we need to be loved." (604). The fact that Morgan exemplifies this common tend in black rappers speaks volumes to their character and why they do what they do, an integral piece to the self perpetuation of their problems. This brings the reader to an understanding of where Morgan is coming from and gives a brief window to where she wants to take this argument in an attempt to provide a solution. This is important because it is not a govt official making broad generalizations on issues he has no knowledge on, but an involved activist that truly wants to help using her obvious expertise.

The use of emotional appeals is evident and mandatory in this piece in order to convey the reality of the black community in what they've been through to what they are going through. Morgan centralizes on how the common enemy of her community is not who they are fighting, they are fighting against each other in a war with no end in sight before a change in the priorities of those involved. She states "According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the number of black two-parent households has decreased from 74 percent to 48 percent since 1960. The leading cause of death among black men ages fifteen to twenty-four is homicide. the majority of them will die at the hand of other black men"(602). Depressing figures convey the reality of this war the black community is so involved in and her obvious hatred for it. She is speaking out to the world in this article but really wants to hit home for those involved in this war and try to spark a realistic hatred for it in others.

Another aspect of Morgans writing is her use of cause and effect for the women involved in these rappers lives and how they are not only hurting themselves but helping refuel this self-destructive cycle. Morgan explains that the rappers use these women to hide their pain and true struggles and that they are more than happy to oblige, she explains "Backstage, the road, and the hood are populated with women who would do anything to be with a rapper sexually for an hour if not a night."(605). She sees these women going after what they want and doesn't criticize them for that, its for the self humiliation they put themselves through in order to get what they want she has a problem with. She has a problem with degrading all women by perpetuating this idolization and fascination with these men by doing absurd and ridiculous things that make rules for other women as to what is acceptable and what is successful which in turn simplifies all women and turns them into objects just for an individual's success for a night or a day or a week. This all centralizes around the war the black community is facing, Morgan wants to stop the root of this problem by making women aware of what their sacrifice does to all women and what they really gain from it.

I enjoyed this piece and learned a significant amount from it. It is an important front that Morgan is facing and I support her movement. Anyone who reads this article will walk away a bit more educated and understanding. I really like the idea of understanding the demographic of this country just a little bit more,  considering it is the most complicated and layered collection of people in history, provides a new insight every time you are given a new perspective, and I don't plan on letting it go to waste.

Sunday, October 21, 2012

RR: Kimmel

In Michael Kimmel's "Bro's Before Hos: The Guy Code", he elaborates on how men are meant to operate in today's society with respect to general acceptance by other men. He says that men are constantly being judged and scrutinized by other men based off what they say, how they dress and if they are emotionally open, leading to exposed weaknesses and forced defense systems that have no connection to biology or the general make-up of man. In other words, "the guy code" is essentially a a false belief system comprised of ideals that conflict with man's natural growth and biological harmony with their bodies, minds and general well being.
Homophobia definitely plays a huge role in "the guy code", perhaps the most central role simply because the  ideals in the guy code itself are polar opposites to the ideals of the stereotypical homosexual. Kimmel certainly feels it plays a factor by saying "[t]he cardinal rule of manhood, the one from which all the other characteristics- wealth, power, status, strength, physicality- are derived is to offer constant proof that you are not gay" (613). Although not congruent with all powerful men, the fact that we are all trying to escape from a single idea or a single perspective of ourselves makes all too much sense. Why else is our society so successful and clearly striving for dominance and competition when as children these ideals of emulating an immovable object are so prevalent? It is because we as men, every minute of every day are battling our innate need for emotional connectivity, centralized self-awareness and ability to say "I'm wrong" which has lead to a warped view of not only what a man truly is but what reality is and how any individual actually effects it. The idea of being gay has manifested into the opposite of what it takes to make your mark on the world and therefore been considered taboo by those who have lead the example of success and power. There is no logic in "the guy code" other than the man next to you is better, therefore something is wrong with you, you need to fix it. It is a complete fallacy created by greed and competition derived from our need to not be misperceived as strange or abnormal which has taken physical from as gay.

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Final Polish Proposition 30 OP-ED



Proposition Education
Ethan Ahlstrom
10/16/2012
English 2

             
              It is well known that this nation is facing a financial crisis, leading to cuts in valuable programs that not only help our nation progress, but bring more money back into our economy. California is a shining example of how improper usage of funds and mismanagement of essential programs has lead to devastating cuts. Everyday schools seem to lose more than they give. With class sizes shrinking, course offerings disappearing and tuition exploding the education system is enduring a problem that has never been seen before. In Community Colleges alone we have seen $809 million in budget cuts in the last 3 years, and 485,000 student enrollment decreases with a 24% reduction in course sections over the past 4 years. Governor Jerry Brown has taken the role of foreman for the California redemption job site by advocating Proposition 30 hopefully bringing billions of dollars back to our schools. With voting day within sight, it is important for residents of this great state to see our issues and realize what will happen to our schools should Prop 30 not pass. Education needs to be our priority, it is the key to a future of plenty for Californians and everyone needs to do their part to save our most important commodity, an educated populace.
               What we as a state face on November 6th is a chance to save our schools from a near $6 billion cut affecting K-12, Community Colleges, CSU and UC school systems. This gives us a chance to save thousands of jobs for instructors and administrators, save courses, resources and enrollment cuts. Prop 30 avoids a $250 million cut to CSU and UC each and stops an additional $150 tuition increase for CSU this coming spring. CSU tuition has increased 300% in the past decade and at Cabrillo College we have seen over 400 classes dropped, roughly 95 staff jobs lost and a tuition hike from $26/unit to $46/unit. These classes are too expensive as it is and we can expect more loans for students and an increased drop-out rate due simply to a lack of means as opposed to a lack of motivation or need.
                In recent years we have seen numerous measures to raise taxes fail under California voters. This is due to the lack of concise assurances that these tax raises will go to what is needed, not for the state government, high/low income families, cancer research, state parks, but for the entire population and future of the state. These are all factors in a healthy economy and thriving community but in order for a population to willingly vote to pay more, they must be convinced that there is no alternative to enhancing their lives and the lives of their children. Proposition 30 is what the state has been waiting for, we have the need, the representation and the means. These means include an increase on sales tax for .25% for 4 years and an income tax increase of 1%-3% for high income earners of over $250,000 annually for 7 years. These earners make up 3% of the population and yet would generate 90% of the Proposition’s revenue, should it pass.
               Now, in the past Californians have not been keen on the idea of taxing those who have earned there money. Are they simply putting their hard earned dollars to programs that are destined to fail? To politicians and administrators who are not doing their jobs? Perhaps in the past, but now in 2012 as we see the rich get richer and poor, poorer, with unemployment rising, college degrees decreasing and schools losing money we can see the need for change. It is evident that this tax increase is not only necessary it is ethically correct. It is in the best interests of those who can afford it to give to those in need for the success of our state community. As Governor Jerry Brown stated, “If people say no, we don’t want to tax the most rewarded and blessed among us, we want to close schools, ok. I’ll manage the best we can”. Taxing the rich has become California’s fail-safe. The state is on the shoulders of these high income earners and it is time for them to make the difference. Voters need to understand that without this tax increase our schools will continue to take cuts, lose jobs and paint a grim picture for the future and generations to come.
          As a Community College student and future CSU student, I find myself jumping from one cut to the next. College has changed in the way that not only do you need more units and a broader spectrum of subjects in order to get a degree, you have to wrestle to get into these classes  as well as paying a minimum of $70 per textbook on top of the  near doubled tuition since 2009. It seems an uphill battle has turned into a rock climb with no equipment, and the only way to continue is take loans from one source or another, making every student stop and wonder “Is this worth my time?” I've gone through semesters where I haven’t gotten over 9 units simply because I was sitting on the floor with 10 other hopefuls. This does not make for a good learning atmosphere. There is plenty of competition after college, seeing this much now in the beginning stages of my adult life and the reality of the importance of succeeding and the consequences of not, when there is only so much in your power is simply depressing.
       On top of the seemingly unacceptable cuts our schools are taking currently, we can expect much worse should this Prop not pass. California is preparing for either outcome from the measure and the motions that have been set are disturbing for any involved in the schooling system. H.D. Palmer, spokesman for the state department of finance explains that if the measure doesn't pass “we still have an obligation to maintain spending closely to the revenues we take in, so the legislature pre-approved a package of so-called trigger cuts, reductions in state spending, that will automatically take effect on Jan 1 of next year”. Together, K-12 and College school systems make up over half of the California state budget meaning these “trigger cuts” will result in $5.4 billion being cut from K-12 schools and Community Colleges. Alternatively, Proposition 30 states that temporary tax revenues from the measure will be applied specifically to K-12 at 89% and Community Colleges at 11%. Meaning, the failing of Proposition 30 will result in no new funding for the schools as well as a massive cut to an already dwindling system.
               The future of California is at stake. We need to show support for students, teachers and administrators so they can make our education system as meaningful and effective as it used to be. In K-12 we are seeing the lowest SAT scores in history, grades are down, teachers are losing jobs and resources and we are facing a 3 week cut in K-12 schools, while the rest of the world seems to be excelling. I went to boarding school in Great Britain for 8th grade. I was 13 years old, went to school at 7 am, took twelve classes per day and finished class around 5 pm. This was normal to most students, most of them got off class and immediately started working on course work. They were introduced to critical thinking and argumentation long before I arrived and I found myself overwhelmed and under-prepared. We simply cannot afford to be making cuts to our schools that are teaching our children how to live and grow and succeed in the real world. There is no question why we are outsourcing jobs and degrading our own achievements when we are facing a world that is steaming ahead.
I see Proposition 30 as the beginning of the new education system in California, we have a chance to shape the future of this state. We need to set an example and prove to ourselves and this nation that education is the key to our success, not only in our personal lives, but on a global scale. If we want to be considered a world leader, if we want to be proud of where we’re from and how our labor shapes our society then we need to invest in education. Stopping catastrophic cuts, funding our schools and changing our perspectives for the greater good is how we create a foundation for future generations for years to come. Where children go to school with books and motivated teachers, where college students find their goals are not being prohibited by obstacles they cannot defeat and where we create a more unified state with the sole purpose of improving our future.
Works Cited
"California Proposition 30, Sales and Income Tax Increase (2012)." - Ballotpedia. N.p., 23 Sept. 2012. Web. 23 Sept. 2012. <http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/California_Proposition_30,_Sales_and_Income_Tax_Increase_(2012)>.

Kelly, Erika. "Prop. 30: Taxes for Schools and Public Safety: The California Report." The California Report. KQED Public Radio, 3 Oct. 2012. Web. 14 Oct. 2012. <http://www.californiareport.org/archive/R201210030850/a>.

Mapp, Lauren J. "The Mesa Press." : Looming Budget Cuts May Depend on Prop 30. N.p., 11 Oct. 2012. Web. 14 Oct. 2012. <http://www.mesapress.com/news/2012/10/11/looming-budget-cuts-may-depend-on-prop-30/>.

Schiff, Lisa. "BeyondChron: San Francisco's Alternative Online Daily News » School Beat: CaliforniaÂ’s     Competing Tax Measures." BeyondChron: San Francisco's Alternative Online Daily News » School Beat: CaliforniaÂ’s Competing Tax Measures. Beyond Chron, 6 Sept. 2012. Web. 23 Sept. 2012. <http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=10463>.

Sunday, October 14, 2012

Final Draft


Proposition Education
Ethan Ahlstrom
               It is well known that this nation is facing a financial crisis, leading to cuts in valuable programs that not only help our nation progress, but bring more money back into our economy. California is a shining example of how improper usage of funds and mismanagement of essential programs has lead to devastating cuts. Everyday schools seem to lose more than they give. With class sizes shrinking, course offerings disappearing and tuition exploding the education system is enduring a problem that has never been seen before. In Community Colleges alone we have seen $809 million in budget cuts in the last 3 years, and 485,000 student enrollment decreases with 24% reduction in course sections over the past 4 years. Governor Jerry Brown has taken the role of foreman for the California redemption job site by advocating Proposition 30 hopefully bringing billions of dollars back to our schools. With voting day within sight, it is important for residents of this great state to see the issues and realize what will happen to our schools should Prop 30 not pass. Education needs to be our priority, it is the key to a future of plenty for Californians and everyone needs to do their part to save our most important commodity, an educated populace.
               What we as a state face on November 6th is a chance to save our schools from a near $6 billion cut affecting K-12, Community Colleges, CSU and UC school systems. This gives us a chance to save thousands of jobs for instructors and administrators, saving courses and resources and enrollment cuts. Prop 30 avoids a $250 million cut to CSU and UC each and stops an additional $150 tuition increase for this coming spring. CSU tuition has increased 300% in the past decade and at Cabrillo College we have seen over 400 classes dropped, roughly 95 staff jobs lost and a tuition hike from $26/unit to $46/unit. These classes are too expensive as it is and we can expect more loans for students and an increased drop-out rate due simply to a lack of means as opposed to a lack of motivation or need.
                In recent years we have seen numerous measures to raise taxes fail under California voters. This is due to the lack of concise assurances that these tax raises will go to what is needed, not for the state government, high/low income families, cancer research, state parks, but for the entire population and future of the state. These are all factors in a healthy economy and thriving community but in order for a population to willingly vote to pay more, they must be convinced that there is no alternative to enhancing their lives and the lives of their children. Proposition 30 is what the state has been waiting for, we have the need, the representation and the means. The means include an increase on sales tax for .25% for 4 years and an income tax increase for 1%-3% for high income earners of over $250,000 annually for 7 years. These earners make up 3% of the population and yet would generate 90% of the Proposition’s revenue, should it pass.
               Now, in the past Californians have not been keen on the idea of taxing those who can afford it. Are they simply putting their hard earned dollars to programs that are destined to fail? To politicians and administrators who are not doing their jobs? Perhaps in the past, but now in 2012 as we see the rich get richer and poor, poorer, with unemployment rising, college degrees decreasing and schools losing money we can see the need for change. It is evident that this tax increase is not only necessary it is ethically correct. It is in the best interests of those who can afford it to give to those in need for the success of our state community. As Governor Jerry Brown stated, “If people say no, we don’t want to tax the most rewarded and blessed among us, we want to close schools, ok. I’ll manage the best we can”. Taxing the rich has become California’s fail-safe. The state is on the shoulders of these high income earners and it is time for them to make the difference. Voters need to understand that without this tax increase our schools will continue to take cuts, lose jobs and paint a grim picture for the future and generations to come.
               On top of the seemingly unacceptable cuts our schools are taking currently, we can expect much worse should this Prop not pass. California is preparing for either outcome from the measure and the motions that have been set are disturbing for any involved in the schooling system. H.D. Palmer, spokesman for the state department of finance explains that if the measure doesn't pass “we still have an obligation to maintain spending closely to the revenues we take in, so the legislature pre-approved a package of so-called trigger cuts, reductions in state spending, that will automatically take effect on Jan 1 of next year”. Together, K-12 and College school systems make up over half of the California state budget meaning these “trigger cuts” will result in $5.4 billion being cut from K-12 schools and Community Colleges. Alternatively Proposition 30 states that temporary tax revenues from the measure will be applied specifically to K-12 at 89% and Community Colleges at 11%. Meaning, the failing of Proposition 30 will result in no new funding for the schools as well as a massive cut to an already dwindling system.
               As a Community College student and future CSU student, I find myself jumping from one cut to the next. College has changed in the way that not only do you need more units and a broader spectrum of subjects in order to get a degree, you have to wrestle to get into these classes  as well as paying a minimum of $70 per textbook on top of the  near doubled tuition since 2009. It seems an uphill battle has turned into a rock climb with no equipment, and the only way to continue is take loans from one source or another, making every student stop and wonder “Is this worth my time?” I've gone through semesters where I haven’t gotten over 9 units simply because I was sitting on the floor with 10 other hopefuls. This does not make for a good learning atmosphere. There is plenty of competition after college, seeing this much now in the beginning stages of my adult life and the reality of the importance of succeeding and the consequences of not, when there is only so much in your power is simply depressing.
               The future of California is at stake. We need to show support for students, teachers and administrators so they can make our education system as meaningful and effective as it used to be. In K-12 we are seeing the lowest SAT scores in history, grades are down, teachers are losing jobs and resources and we are facing a 3 week cut in K-12 schools, while the rest of the world seems to be excelling. I went to boarding school in Great Britain for 8th grade. I was 13 years old, went to school at 7 am, took twelve classes per day and finished class around 5 pm. This was normal to most students, most of them got off class and immediately started working on course work. They were introduced to critical thinking and argumentation long before I arrived and I found myself overwhelmed and under-prepared. We simply cannot afford to be making cuts to our schools that are teaching our children how to live and grow and succeed in the real world. There is no question why we are outsourcing jobs and degrading our own achievements when we are facing a world that is steaming ahead.
I see Proposition 30 as the beginning of the new education system in California, we have a chance and to shape the future of this state. We need to set an example and prove to ourselves and this nation that education is the key to our success, not only in our personal lives, but on a global scale. If we want to be considered a world leader, if we want to be proud of where we’re from and how our labor shapes our society then we need to invest in education. Stopping catastrophic cuts, funding our schools and changing our perspectives for the greater good is how we create a foundation for future generations for years to come. Where children go to school with books and motivated teachers, where college students find their goals are not being prohibited by obstacles they cannot defeat and where we create a more unified state with the sole purpose of improving our future.






Works Cited
"California Proposition 30, Sales and Income Tax Increase (2012)." - Ballotpedia. N.p., 23 Sept. 2012. Web. 23 Sept. 2012. <http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/California_Proposition_30,_Sales_and_Income_Tax_Increase_(2012)>.

Kelly, Erika. "Prop. 30: Taxes for Schools and Public Safety: The California Report." The California Report. KQED Public Radio, 3 Oct. 2012. Web. 14 Oct. 2012. <http://www.californiareport.org/archive/R201210030850/a>.

Mapp, Lauren J. "The Mesa Press." : Looming Budget Cuts May Depend on Prop 30. N.p., 11 Oct. 2012. Web. 14 Oct. 2012. <http://www.mesapress.com/news/2012/10/11/looming-budget-cuts-may-depend-on-prop-30/>.

Schiff, Lisa. "BeyondChron: San Francisco's Alternative Online Daily News » School Beat: CaliforniaÂ’s     Competing Tax Measures." BeyondChron: San Francisco's Alternative Online Daily News » School Beat: CaliforniaÂ’s Competing Tax Measures. Beyond Chron, 6 Sept. 2012. Web. 23 Sept. 2012. <http://www.beyondchron.org/news/index.php?itemid=10463>. 

Sunday, October 7, 2012

Rough draft


Proposition Education
Ethan Ahlstrom
               It is well known that this nation is facing a financial crisis, leading to cuts in valuable and programs that not only help our nation progress, but bring more money back into our economy. California is a shining example of how improper usage of funds and mismanagement of essential programs has lead to devastating cuts. Everyday schools seem to lose more than they give. With class sizes shrinking, course offerings disappearing and tuition exploding the education system is enduring a problem that has never been seen before, at this magnitude. Governor Jerry Brown has taken the role of foreman for the California redemption job site by advocating Proposition 30 hopefully bringing billions of dollars back to our schools. With voting day within sight, it is important for residents of this great state to see the issues and realize what will happen to our schools should Prop 30 not pass. Education needs to be our priority, it is the key to a future of plenty for Californians and everyone needs to do their part to save our most important commodity, an educated populace.
               What we as a state face on November 6th is a chance to save our schools from a near $6 billion cut affecting K-12, Community Colleges, CSU and UC school systems. This gives us a chance to save thousands of jobs for instructors and administrators, saving courses and resources and enrollment cuts. Prop 30 avoids a $250 million cut to CSU and UC each and stops an additional $150 tuition increase for this coming spring. CSU tuition has increased 300% in the past decade and At Cabrillo College we have seen in the past few years 400 classes dropped, roughly 95 staff jobs lost and a tuition hike from $26/unit to $46/unit. These classes are too expensive as it is and we can expect more loans for students and a drop-out rate increase due to simply a lack of means as opposed to a lack of motivation or need.
                              In recent years we have seen numerous ballots to raise taxes fail under California voters. This is due to the lack of concise assurances that these tax raises will go to what is needed, not for the state government, high/low income families, cancer research, state parks, but for the entire population and future of the state. Yes, these are all factors in a healthy economy and thriving community but in order for a population to willingly vote to pay more, they must be convinced that there is no alternative to enhancing their lives and the lives of their children. Proposition 30 is what the state has been waiting for, we have the need, the representation and the means. The means include an increase on sales tax for .25% for 4 years and an income tax increase for 1%-3% for high income earners of over $250,000 annually for 7 years. These earners make up 3% of the population and yet would generate 90% of the Proposition’s revenue, should it pass.
               Now, in the past Californians have not been keen on the idea of taxing those who can afford it, is it their responsibility? Are they simply putting their hard earned dollars to programs that are destined to fail? To politicians and administrators who are not doing their jobs? Perhaps in the past, but now in 2012 as we see the rich get richer and poor, poorer, with unemployment rising, college degrees decreasing and all the while schools losing money. It is evident that this tax increase is not only necessary it is ethically proper. It is in the best interests of those who can afford it to give to those in need for the success of our state community. As Governor Jerry Brown stated, “If people say no, we don’t want to tax the most rewarded and blessed among us, we want to close schools, Ok. I’ll manage the best we can”. Taxing the rich has become California’s fail-safe. The state is on the shoulders of these high income earners and it is time for them to make the difference. Voters need to understand that without this tax increase our schools will continue to take cuts, lose jobs and paint a grim picture for the future and generations to come.
               On top of the seemingly unacceptable cuts our schools are taking currently, we can expect much worse should this Prop not pass. California is preparing for either outcome from the measure and the motions that have been set are disturbing for any involved in the schooling system. H.D. Palmer, spokesman for the state department of finance explains that if the measure doesn’t pass “we still have an obligation to maintain spending closely to the revenues we take in, so the legislature pre-approved a package of so-called trigger cuts, reductions in state spending, that will automatically take effect on Jan 1 of next year”. Together, K-12 and College school systems make up over half of the California state budget meaning these “trigger cuts” will result in $5.4 billion being cut from K-12 schools and Community Colleges. Alternatively Proposition 30 states that temporary tax revenues from the measure will be applied specifically to K-12 at 89% and Community Colleges at 11%. Meaning the failing of Proposition 30 will result in not only a massive cut, but a loss of much needed funding.
               As a Community College student and future CSU student, I find myself jumping from one cut to the next. College has changed in the way that not only do you need more units and a broader spectrum of subjects in order to get a degree, you have to wrestle to get into these classes  as well as paying a minimum of $70 per textbook on top of the  near doubled tuition since 2009. It seems an uphill battle has turned into a rock climb with no equipment, and the only way to continue is take loans from one source or another, making every student stop and wonder “Is this worth my time?” I’ve gone through semesters where I haven’t gotten over 9 units simply because I was sitting on the floor with 10 other hopefuls. This does not make for a good learning atmosphere. There is plenty of competition after college, seeing this much now in the beginning stages of my adult life and the reality of the importance of succeeding and the consequences of not, when there is only so much in your power is simply depressing.
               The future of California is at stake. We need to show support for students, teachers and administrators so they can make our education system as meaningful and effective as it used to be. In K-12 we are seeing the lowest SAT scores in history, grades are down, teachers are losing jobs and resources and we are facing a 3 week cut in all schools, while the rest of the world seems to be excelling. I went to boarding school in Great Britain for 8th grade. I was 13 years old, went to school at 7 am, took twelve classes per day and finished class around 5 pm. This was normal to most students, most of them got off class and immediately started working on course work. They were introduced to critical thinking and argumentation long before I arrived and I found myself overwhelmed and under-prepared. We simply cannot afford to be making cuts on these schools that are teaching our children how to live and grow and succeed in the real world. There is no question why we are outsourcing jobs and degrading our own achievements when we are facing a world that is steaming ahead. I see Proposition 30 as the beginning of the new education system in California, where children go to school with books and motivated teachers, where college students find their goals are not being prohibited by obstacles they cannot defeat and where we create a more unified state with the sole purpose of improving our future.

Sunday, September 30, 2012

Proposal


Title: Proposition Education
Author: Ethan Ahlstrom
Topic: Proposition 30
Exigence: Give every student a chance to educate themselves, not be shut down by obstacles that are simply unbeatable
Intended Audience: Voters, Students, Teachers, Parents
Purpose: Make the reality of our fiscal situation come full circle in the eyes of the reader and see the ramifications of not funding our schools.
Claim: The education system is the key to our future

Writer’s Strategy #1: As a student of a Community College for the past three years my voice carries weight for those that have no knowledge of the effects from budget cuts. Expensive books, crowded classrooms, higher tuition fees and simply not being able to get into classes you want or need to will be a huge factor in how we will be conducting our society in the years to come. Using that knowledge I will expand on what will happen to us students if Proposition 30 does not pass and how that will affect the state as a whole. From 6th to 8th grade I was in Great Britain for schooling and was able to get a simple understanding on the basic differences between the English standards of education and the American. In this school I met people from all over the world who came to study, the challenges the average student went through in order to get the grades they wanted and how it prepared them for graduate school and a career is significantly different than what our students go through, I plan to elaborate on how and why.

Readers Effect #1: This personal experience that I have will give the reader a deeper understanding of what we as students face not only in local schools, but internationally as well. Budget cuts are only digging us a deeper whole in a society where students cannot hope to receive the knowledge base and critical thinking skills required to be competitive today.

Writers Strategy #2: The logical reasoning that I will use in my argument will allow the reader to fully understand what the education system is facing financially and how Proposition 30 will help to prevent further harm. The accountability factor is important for prop 30, meaning those that have means to help, should be helping which is why there is going to be an increase to sales tax from 7.25% to 7.5% and an increase to the amount taxable for those receiving over $250,000 and applicable brackets, meaning the top 3% of tax payers are affected. One of the most important pieces of information that needs to be relayed is what the schools themselves are actually losing currently, and what Prop 30 will prevent and even return to the schools and the students. Should the Prop not pass K-12 will face $5.5 billion in cuts and CSU’s will face $250 million in cuts along with a $150 tuition increase. Should the Prop pass there will be $5.6 billion available for schools, public safety and other necessary functions. In the past five years alone Cabrillo College has seen its tuition increase from $24 per unit to $46 per unit along with 400 classes and roughly 95 staff jobs.

Reader’s Effect #2: The logical reasoning that I will use in my argument will allow the reader to fully understand what the education system is facing financially and how Proposition 30 will help to prevent further harm.

Writers Strategy #3: The two most powerful tools that this argument has are the correlation between past, present and future of the education system, business world and culture of California; and the affects these cuts to education will have on our children and therefore the future of our society. School is getting more expensive, children are getting less out of it and adults aren’t given the resources they need to be successful in their careers which is leading to an increase in the amount of jobs available and a drop in the number of Americans capable of doing these jobs. We are competing internationally now more than we have in the past, we are going over-seas for engineers and instructors while the American people see their opportunities diminish due to their lack of education. Ideals have changed in the past few decades, we live in a time where it’s not enough to work hard to reach your goals, you must work hard and have money and you shall succeed. It is a time where the average citizen cannot work part time, while supporting a family or dealing with a disability and still get the education they deserve. Already we are seeing test score dropping in K-12, our SAT’s have hit an all-time low, our students are going into crowded schools with little resources and our teachers are being over worked for not nearly enough pay. These are new problems and require new solutions that must be activated quickly for the future generations.

Reader’s Effect #3: The reader will come to terms with the reality of the changes the California has gone through and how that has affected education and what we are shaping our children to be. They will see how these struggles are affecting everyone and not just themselves and begin to realize how important it is we make the effort now for the sake of our future.